Radiometric dating of the earth
Radiometric dating of the earth - top dating 4 ua net
"How can creationists expect people to accept a young earth when science has proved through radiometric dating that the earth is billions of years old?
Errors are particularly bad with the K-Ar (potassium-argon) method. Joan Engels wrote: It is now well known that K-Ar ages obtained from different minerals in a single rock may be strikingly discordant.3 Skull 1470 In 1972 Richard Leakey found a skull, near Lake Rudolf in Kenya, that he said was "virtually indistinguishable" from that of a modern human.One is the Carbon-14 system used for dating fragments of once-living organisms.It's never used for non-organic samples, and almost never even attempted if the sample is thought to be much older than about 50,000 years.Certainly the majority of scientists accept radiometric dating.And yet, there is really no scientific reason proving that radiometric dating is correct, and a number of evidences showing that it doesn't work. We'll find that faith in materialism, and rejection of any supernatural activity, is the foundation stone of radiometric analysis, even before any measurements are made.Nontechnical readers can skip the box-figures, however, without losing much.
Experimental Errors The methods that give ancient ages produce almost as many "wrong" answers as "right" ones.Most radiometric arguments were said to favor the 2.6 MY date, but the paleontological arguments favored the 1.8 MY date-(that is where the skull would best fit evolutionary theory).And final agreement came only after paleontologists had agreed on fossil correlations involving two species of extinct pigs. Commenting on this method of selecting rock samples for radiometric dating, Lubenow asks: The question arises, "How does one know when one has good samples for dating?The second broad category is sometimes called "heavy-metal dating," and includes Uranium-Thorium-Lead, Rubidium-Strontium, and Potassium- Argon systems.These are the methods that are commonly used on inorganic samples such as rocks, and that often give extremely long ages-millions or billions of years.Most people, even the experts in the field, forget the assumptions on which radiometric dating is based.